Importance of Return on Investment in Training

Importance of Return on Investment in Training

The Challenge of Justifying Training Expenditure

When economic times are tough, or when cash flow becomes tight, the first area to face cutbacks is often training, learning, and development. Many organizations view the training function as a cost center, necessitating a cultural shift to alter this perception. While it’s accepted that companies need to speculate to accumulate, leading to more training investments during good economic times, it’s crucial to recognize that effective training directly contributes to improved productivity, reduced attrition rates, higher levels of engagement, and reduced wastage. The challenge lies in demonstrating that these improvements result from training and not other factors.

Important Courses: 

Demonstrating ROI in Training

HR departments must prove that there is a Return on Investment (ROI) from training interventions, showcasing the training function as both a long- and short-term investment rather than a cost center. Training has measurable outcomes that can demonstrate ROI. However, many organizations don’t undertake the necessary calculations, leading to training being seen as a ‘nice-to-have’ add-on instead of an essential investment. This cycle of spending and cutbacks needs to be broken.

Course: Innovation & Productivity in the Workplace Training Course

Courses: Office Management and Administration Training Courses

Common Evaluation Methods and Their Limitations

While surveys on training and development evaluation may initially seem promising, suggesting extensive use, a deeper look often reveals reliance on ‘reactionnaires’—general feedback forms with questions like ‘How good was the trainer?’ and ‘How enjoyable was the course?’. According to experts like Kirkpatrick, even well-designed reactionnaires do not constitute proper validation or evaluation of training.

Calculating ROI for Training Programs

There are several methods to calculate ROI, considering numerous factors:

  • Actual Cost of the Training Program: Development and delivery costs.
  • Training Facilities: Expenses for venues and equipment.
  • Trainer Costs: Fees for external trainers or internal resources.
  • Downtime Costs: Costs of employee downtime, replacement employees, or overtime.
  • Travel and Accommodation: Expenses for travel and lodging if required.
  • Administration Costs: Administrative expenses related to organizing and managing training.
  • Line Management Time: Time spent by managers before and after training to ensure its effectiveness.

These factors are relatively easy to measure and help establish the direct and indirect costs of the program. The more challenging, yet achievable, part of the calculation involves determining the impact of training on individual performance and behavior.

Defining Training Objectives

Establishing clear training objectives is crucial:

  • Identifying the Need: Why is there a need for this training?
  • Expected Outcomes: What specific outcomes are anticipated?
  • Impact on Costs and Profit: How will this training affect overall costs and profitability?

Once the objectives are clear, results can be measured, such as increased sales value after training sales teams or reduced accidents following safety training. Key questions to evaluate include:

  • To what extent were the training objectives achieved?
  • How well did learners meet their objectives?
  • What specific knowledge or skills were acquired?
  • What commitments have learners made to apply what they’ve learned?

In some cases, initial reviews may reveal no measurable goals, such as in management training aimed at improving team morale and engagement. A deeper analysis can uncover the broader impact of better management skills.

Using Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model

Another effective approach is applying the four levels of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model:

  1. Reaction: Measure participants’ initial reactions to the training.
  2. Learning: Assess the knowledge or skills gained from the training.
  3. Behavior: Evaluate changes in behavior resulting from the training.
  4. Results: Determine the overall impact on organizational performance.

Though these measures increase in complexity and cost from level 1 to level 4, they provide a comprehensive evaluation of learning in organizations.

Proving the ROI of training programs is essential for shifting the perception of training from a cost center to a vital investment. By using structured evaluation methods and setting clear objectives, organizations can demonstrate the tangible benefits of training on productivity, engagement, and profitability. Breaking the spend-cutback cycle requires a commitment to robust evaluation and a recognition of the long-term value that effective training brings.

level

Evaluation Type
(what is measured)

Evaluation description and Characteristics

Examples of evaluation tools and Methods

Relevance and Practicability

1

Reaction

Reaction evaluation is how the delegates felt about the training or learning experience.

‘Happy sheets’, feedback forms.

Verbal reaction, post-training surveys or questionnaires.

Quick and very easy to obtain.

Not expensive to gather or to analyse.

2

Learning

Learning evaluation is the measurement of the increase in knowledge – before and after.

Typically assessments or tests before and after the training.

Interview or observation can also be used.

Relatively simple to set up; clear-cut for quantifiable skills.

Less easy for complex learning.

3

Behaviour

Behaviour evaluation is the extent of applied learning back on the job – implementation.

Observation and interview over time are required to assess change, relevance of change, and sustainability of change.

Measurement of behaviour change typically requires cooperation and skill of line-managers.

4

Results 

Results evaluation is the effect on the business or environment by the trainee.

Measures are already in place via normal management systems and reporting – the challenge is to relate to the trainee.

Individually not difficult; unlike whole organisation.

Process must attribute clear accountabilities.

 

For an in-depth study of Managing and Measuring Training, please click here

Copyright © 2025 AZTech Training & Consultancy - All rights reserved.

AZTech Training & Consultancy
Chat with an assistant

Amina
Hello there
how can I assist you?
1:40
×