When economic times are tough, or when cash flow becomes tight, the first area to face cutbacks is often training, learning, and development. Many organizations view the training function as a cost center, necessitating a cultural shift to alter this perception. While it's accepted that companies need to speculate to accumulate, leading to more training investments during good economic times, it's crucial to recognize that effective training directly contributes to improved productivity, reduced attrition rates, higher levels of engagement, and reduced wastage. The challenge lies in demonstrating that these improvements result from training and not other factors.
Important Courses:
HR departments must prove that there is a Return on Investment (ROI) from training interventions, showcasing the training function as both a long- and short-term investment rather than a cost center. Training has measurable outcomes that can demonstrate ROI. However, many organizations don't undertake the necessary calculations, leading to training being seen as a ‘nice-to-have’ add-on instead of an essential investment. This cycle of spending and cutbacks needs to be broken.
Course: Innovation & Productivity in the Workplace Training Course
Courses: Office Management and Administration Training Courses
While surveys on training and development evaluation may initially seem promising, suggesting extensive use, a deeper look often reveals reliance on 'reactionnaires'—general feedback forms with questions like 'How good was the trainer?' and 'How enjoyable was the course?'. According to experts like Kirkpatrick, even well-designed reactionnaires do not constitute proper validation or evaluation of training.
There are several methods to calculate ROI, considering numerous factors:
These factors are relatively easy to measure and help establish the direct and indirect costs of the program. The more challenging, yet achievable, part of the calculation involves determining the impact of training on individual performance and behavior.
Establishing clear training objectives is crucial:
Once the objectives are clear, results can be measured, such as increased sales value after training sales teams or reduced accidents following safety training. Key questions to evaluate include:
In some cases, initial reviews may reveal no measurable goals, such as in management training aimed at improving team morale and engagement. A deeper analysis can uncover the broader impact of better management skills.
Another effective approach is applying the four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model:
Though these measures increase in complexity and cost from level 1 to level 4, they provide a comprehensive evaluation of learning in organizations.
Proving the ROI of training programs is essential for shifting the perception of training from a cost center to a vital investment. By using structured evaluation methods and setting clear objectives, organizations can demonstrate the tangible benefits of training on productivity, engagement, and profitability. Breaking the spend-cutback cycle requires a commitment to robust evaluation and a recognition of the long-term value that effective training brings.
|
level |
Evaluation Type |
Evaluation description and Characteristics |
Examples of evaluation tools and Methods |
Relevance and Practicability |
|
1 |
Reaction |
Reaction evaluation is how the delegates felt about the training or learning experience. |
'Happy sheets', feedback forms. Verbal reaction, post-training surveys or questionnaires. |
Quick and very easy to obtain. Not expensive to gather or to analyse. |
|
2 |
Learning |
Learning evaluation is the measurement of the increase in knowledge - before and after. |
Typically assessments or tests before and after the training. Interview or observation can also be used. |
Relatively simple to set up; clear-cut for quantifiable skills. Less easy for complex learning. |
|
3 |
Behaviour |
Behaviour evaluation is the extent of applied learning back on the job - implementation. |
Observation and interview over time are required to assess change, relevance of change, and sustainability of change. |
Measurement of behaviour change typically requires cooperation and skill of line-managers. |
|
4 |
Results |
Results evaluation is the effect on the business or environment by the trainee. |
Measures are already in place via normal management systems and reporting - the challenge is to relate to the trainee. |
Individually not difficult; unlike whole organisation. Process must attribute clear accountabilities. |
For an in-depth study of Managing and Measuring Training, please click here